Results from Counts Made in Botany 130 Labs
Spring, 2007
Percentage of total in parentheses.
Sum of percentages may not equal 100 due to rounding error.
| Section | Interphase | Prophase | Metaphase | Anaphase | Telophase |
| 601 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| 602 | 1588 | 141 | 93 | 63 | 35 |
| 603 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| 605 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| 606 | 1451 | 344 | 73 | 49 | 110 |
| 607 | 1023 | 330 | 111 | 127 | 209 |
| 608 | 5839 | 266 | 129 | 82 | 108 |
| 609 | 2636 | 576 | 298 | 222 | 537 |
| 610 | 9036 | 383 | 102 | 83 | 91 |
| 611 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| 612 | no data | no data | no data | no data | no data |
| Total | 2040 | 806 | 626 | 1090 |
Of those reported undergoing mitosis in the Fall of2007:
45% Were in Prophase (60% in 1992)
18% Were in Metaphase (16% in 1992)
14% Were in Anaphase (10% in 1992)
11% Were in Telophase (24% in 1992)
Of those undergoing mitosis in the Spring of2007:
65% Were in Prophase (60% in 1992)
12% Were in Metaphase (16% in 1992)
12% Were in Anaphase (10% in 1992)
11% Were in Telophase (14% in 1992)
Of those undergoing mitosis in 2004:
54% Were in Prophase (60% in 1992)
14% Were in Metaphase (16% in 1992)
12% Were in Anaphase (10% in 1992)
19% Were in Telophase (14% in 1992)